Why Spell Check and History Don't Mix

Updating Open Office has left me with a dictionary which recognises only words I've added to the dictionary since installing Open Office in 2009. The results are fairly hilarious...

Aethelred
Alcuin
Anglian
Athelstan
Cuthbert
Faroe
Finchley
Frisia
Guildsmen
Hanoverians
Hemel
Hempstead
Justinian
Lindisfarne
Mercia
Merovingian
Offa
Picts
Plantagenet
Pompei
Prussia
Regnal
Toponym
Vinland

A broadly accurate summary really...

The Wit and Wisdome of Bill Clinton, Mk. IV

A preemptive action today, however well-justified, may come back with unwelcome consequences in the future. And because … I've done this. I've ordered these kinds of actions — I don't care how precise your bombs and your weapons are, when you set them off, innocent people will die.

Bill Clinton, addressing the Labour Party conference, Oct 2002

The Wit and Wisdom of... Donald Dewar

The Nationalists came to Hamilton promising victory. They have been promising victory for as long as I can remember - and now victory for them means coming second - again.

Having stepped through the looking glass they argue that Labour's tax policies, returning money to hard working families somehow attracts votes to them. But the one thing they try to hide is the stark reality that is their sole reason for existing - splitting the United Kingdom, breaking up Britain - Nationalism - is unacceptable to the more than 70% of Scots who will not vote for them.

It is not just their view of the world which is distorted. They have strange views on dissent. Their standing orders make clear that any unauthorised contact with the press is a hanging offence - well perhaps not hanging, but their Chief Whip has cheerfully gone on record saying that anyone who strays is liable to be dropped from the group. It is their form of deselection. I quote - "It is as if such a person went under a bus. The next one on the list would simply take his place".

It sure gives a certain sinister meaning to the phrase - "next please".

Then there is the puzzling case of the party's economic spokesman. Within the same week he argued that it was possible to be British, to be proud of it, yet vote against Britain for separatism. And then just as quickly changed tack, describing the Union Flag as offensive, - a relic of colonialism. They tell me he is a nice young man - he did eventually apologise - but would you put him in charge of your finances?

I can remember Free by '93. I thought then that it was straight from the great McGonigall school of politics - of dubious benefit but endlessly reusable. And they will use it decade after decade after decade.

Enough of the SNP - the politics of illusion are not for us.

Donald Dewar, first First Minister of Scotland, addressing the Labour conference, Sept 1999

The Wit and Wisdom of... Jean Chrétien

For the first time in my mandate as Prime Minister, I have asked to speak directly to Canadians tonight.

I do so because we are in an exceptional situation.

Tonight, in particular, I want to speak to my fellow Quebecers. Because, at this moment, the future of our whole country is in their hands.

But I also want to speak to all Canadians. Because this issue concerns them  --  deeply. It is not only the future of Quebec that will be decided on Monday. It is the future of all of Canada. The decision that will be made is serious and irreversible. With deep, deep consequences.

What is at stake is our country. What is at stake is our heritage. To break up Canada or build Canada. To remain Canadian or no longer be Canadian. To stay or to leave. This is the issue of the referendum.

When my fellow Quebecers make their choice on Monday, they have the responsibility and the duty to understand the implications of that choice.

The fact is, that hidden behind a murky question is a very clear option. It is the separation of Quebec. A Quebec that would no longer be part of Canada. Where Quebecers would no longer enjoy the rights and privileges associated with Canadian citizenship. Where Quebecers would no longer share a Canadian passport or a Canadian dollar  --  no matter what the advocates of separatism may claim.

Where Quebecers would be made foreigners in their own country.

I know that many Quebecers, in all good faith, are thinking of voting YES in order to bring change to Canada. I am telling them that if they wish to remain Canadian, they are taking a very dangerous gamble. Anyone who really wants to remain a Canadian should think twice before taking such a dangerous risk. Listen to the leaders of the separatist side. They are very clear. The country they want is not a better Canada, it is a separate Quebec. Don't be fooled.

There are also those Quebecers who are thinking of voting YES to give Quebec a better bargaining position to negotiate an economic and political partnership with the rest of Canada. Again, don't be fooled. A YES vote means the destruction of the political and economic union we already enjoy. Nothing more.

Through the course of this campaign, I have listened to my fellow Quebecers, and I have heard them say how deeply attached they are to Canada. I have listened  --  and I understand  --  that they have been hurt and disappointed in the past. I have also heard the voices for change that are echoing throughout Quebec and across Canada. Our country is changing. And we all know it. I ask you to remember all that this government has done over the last two years to help create change  --  positive change.

The end of Canada would be nothing less than the end of a dream. The end of a country that has made us the envy of the world. Canada is not just any country. It is unique. It is the best country in the world.

Perhaps it is something we have come to take for granted. But we should never, never let that happen. Once more, today it's up to each of us to restate our love for Canada. To say we don't want to lose it.

What we have built together in Canada is something very great and very noble. A country whose values of tolerance, understanding, generosity have made us what we are: a society where our number one priority is the respect and dignity of all our citizens.

Other countries invest in weapons, we invest in the well-being of our citizens. Other countries tolerate poverty and despair, we work hard to ensure a basic level of decency for everyone. Other countries resort to violence to settle differences, we work out our problems through compromise and mutual respect.

This is what we have accomplished.

And I say to my fellow Quebecers don't let anyone diminish or take away what we have accomplished. Don't let anyone tell you that you cannot be a proud Quebecer and a proud Canadian.

It is true Canada is not perfect. But I cannot think of a single place in the world that comes closer. Not a single place where people lead better lives. Where they live in greater peace and security.

Why does Canada work? Because our country has always been able to adapt and change to meet the hopes and aspirations of our citizens. We've done so in the past. We're doing so today. And we will continue to do so in the future.

And I repeat tonight what I said yesterday in Verdun. We must recognize that Quebec's language, its culture and institutions make it a distinct society. And no constitutional change that affects the powers of Quebec should ever be made without the consent of Quebecers.

And that all governments  --  federal and provincial  --  must respond to the desire of Canadians  --  everywhere  --  for greater decentralization.

And all that can happen quietly, calmly, without rupture  --  with determination.

To all Canadians outside Quebec, I say do not lose faith in this country. And continue to show the respect, the openness, the attachment, and the friendship you have shown to your fellow Canadians in Quebec all through the referendum campaign. Continue to tell them how important they are to you. And how without them, Canada would no longer be Canada. How you want them to remain Canadian and you hope, deeply and profoundly, that they choose Canada on Monday. In recent days, thousands of Canadians have taken the time to send messages of friendship and attachment to Quebecers. Keep them coming.

My friends, once again, our country is facing a crisis. And crisis and uncertainty exact a very heavy cost. We all pay a high price for political instability.

On Monday, once Quebecers have shown their commitment to Canada, I want to ask Canadian investors and foreign investors to show their commitment and confidence in return. Together, we will need to get our priorities back on track. On economic growth and jobs. And the time is long overdue.

My friends, we are facing a decisive moment in the history of our country. And people all across Canada know that decision lies in the hands of their fellow Canadians in Quebec.

As a proud Quebecer and a proud Canadian, I am convinced that a strong Quebec in a united Canada remains the best solution for all of us. I ask those Quebecers who have not yet made their decision to ask themselves these questions when they vote on Monday:

Do you really think that you and your family would have a better quality of life and a brighter future in a separate Quebec?

Do you really think that the French language and culture in North America would be better protected in a separate Quebec?

Do you really think you and your family will enjoy greater security in a separate Quebec?

Do you really want to turn your back on Canada? Does Canada deserve that?

Are you really ready to tell the world  --  the whole world  --  that people of different languages, different cultures and different backgrounds cannot live together in harmony?

Do you really think that ties of friendship and understanding... ties of mutual trust and respect can be broken without harm or rancour?

Have you found one reason, one good reason, to destroy Canada?

Do you really think it is worth abandoning the country we have built, and which our ancestors have left us?

Do you really think it makes make any sense  --  any sense at all  --  to break up Canada?

These are the questions I ask each of you to consider. It's a big, very big responsibility.

In a few days, all the shouting will be over. And at that moment, you will be alone to make your decision. At that moment I urge you, my fellow Quebecers, to listen to your heart  --  and to your head.

Speech on national television by the Canadian Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, on the eve of the 1995 Quebec independence referendum. Quebec voted to remain in Canada by a mere 1.16%.

The Wit and Wisdom of... Gerald Ford

I believe that truth is the glue that holds government together, not only our Government but civilization itself. That bond, though strained, is unbroken at home and abroad.

Gerald Ford, on assuming the US Presidency, 09/08/1974. His predecessor, Richard Nixon, became the only US President to resign, hounded from office by the Watergate scandal.

The Wit and Wisdom of... Ramsay MacDonald

The right hon. Gentleman, to a House which in a great majority is with him, has delivered a speech the echoes of which will go down in history. The speech has been impressive, but however much we may resist the conclusion to which he has come, we have not been able to resist the moving character of his appeal.

I think he is wrong. I think the Government which he represents and for which he speaks is wrong. I think the verdict of history will be that they are wrong. We shall see.

The effect of the right hon. Gentleman's speech in this House is not to be its final effect. There may be opportunities, or there may not be opportunities for us to go into details, but I want to say to this House, and to say it without equivocation, if the right hon. Gentleman had come here to-day and told us that our country is in danger, I do not care what party he appealed to, or to what class he appealed, we would be with him and behind him. If this is so, we will vote him what money he wants. Yes, and we will go further. We will offer him ourselves if the country is in danger. But he has not persuaded me that it is. He has not persuaded my hon. Friends who cooperate with me that it is, and I am perfectly certain, when his speech gets into cold print to-morrow, he will not persuade a large section of the country. If the nation's honour were in danger we would be with him. There has been no crime committed by statesmen of this character without those statesmen appealing to their nation's honour. We fought the Crimean War because of our honour. We rushed to South Africa because of our honour. The right hon. Gentleman is appealing to us to-day because of our honour.

There is a third point. If the right hon. Gentleman could come to us and tell us that a small European nationality like Belgium is in danger, and could assure us he is going to confine the conflict to that question, then we would support him. What is the use of talking about coming to the aid of Belgium, when, as a matter of fact, you are engaging in a whole European War which is not going to leave the map of Europe in the position it is in now. The right hon. Gentleman said nothing about Russia. We want to know about that. We want to try to find out what is going to happen, when it is all over, to the power of Russia in Europe, and we are not going to go blindly into this conflict without having some sort of a rough idea as to what is going to happen.

Finally, so far as France is concerned, we say solemnly and definitely that no such friendship as the right hon. Gentleman describes between one nation and another could ever justify one of those nations entering into war on behalf of the other. If France is really in danger, if, as the result of this, we are going to have the power, civilisation, and genius of France removed from European history, then let him so say. But it is an absolutely impossible conception, which we are talking about to endeavour to justify that which the right hon. Gentleman has foreshadowed.

Ramsay MacDonald, Leader of the Labour Party, responding Sir Edward Grey in the House of Commons on Britain's decision to enter the Great War, August 1914

The Wit and Wisdom of... Harold Wilson, Mk. II

Interviewer: Who has influenced you? 

Wilson: Well, as I have said, my parents and the Scout movement.

Harold Wilson, Prime Minister 1964-70 and 1974-76, outlining the two biggest influences on his life philosophy, 1967.